I don't think this is what normally happens (when I check after the segfault, every other time the process is not running). Does the local network need to be hacked first for IoT devices to be accesible? Jan 13 11:03:05 trahersa-test kernel: login: segfault at 0 ip b7ec346d sp bff0e060 error 4 in libpam.so.0.79[b7ebf000+7000] Jan 13 11:04:49 trahersa-test kernel: login: segfault at 0 ip b7ed246d sp bfd1c670 error Then I replaced that name with the name of a machine that actually exists, and it core dumped again. http://wx2me.com/segfault-at/segfault-at-ip-sp-error-4-in-libc-2-13-so.php
The tests I'm running for every release are not encountering this problem, so I'd like to know under what conditions this problem occurs so I can reproduce it to fix it, No memory problems at allTo check that my processor was still working fine, I tried compiling a relatively heavy project (scummvm) with a -j4 option to use both cores. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed also, problems started before i updated to 2.15, which was just about a week ago. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20679292/locate-where-in-libc-my-segfault-occurs
Compile your code with -g switch, then run the generated binary with some memory debugger like valgrind and check what is the output from valgrind. If you convert it to binary that becomes clear. /* * Page fault error code bits * bit 0 == 0 means no page found, 1 means protection fault * bit I turned on the monitor and I see the following: I tried to login: login: segfault at 0 ip b7ec346d sp bf0e060 error 4 in libpam.so.0.79[b7ebf000+7000] tried to reboot with ctrl-alt-del: Reproduce the problem under gdb.
After debuginfo-install rpcbind-0.2.0-21.fc19.x86_64 I get Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff7415e29 in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=s@entry=0x555555774dd0, format=
Now reproduce the crash, then open your file manager, navigate to your /var/crash directory and open the crash report you wish to submit. Oh, I see. Anyone has one? https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17162 I would hate to have to figure something else out.
On that note, answer the obvious following questions: 1: Has any software changed? 2: Has any hardware changed? So, what I can do now is to analyze which function in libc (called by my program) caused this segfault, then I can check my code. set the -logfile option to generate a log file (specify a location large enough to handle a large log file)3. I'm left with absolutely no ideas...
How to describe very tasty and probably unhealthy food What does "Game of the Year" actually mean? c segmentation-fault libc share|improve this question edited Dec 20 '13 at 3:37 asked Dec 19 '13 at 10:35 Wang Tuma 216419 2 Have you tried googling with your title? Browse other questions tagged linux qt webkit kernel segmentation-fault or ask your own question. It may be that libQtWebKit is habitually mishandling that error, or it may be that there's something else that's going on.
Last edited by GaijinPunch; 01-13-2009 at 09:22 PM. my review here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gary13579 0 Member Established Members 0 10 posts Posted January 5, 2011 · Report post Here is the log output What is the rationale behind decltype behavior? 知っているはずです is over complicated? What else might be causing this problem?
Last edited by landysaccount; 01-13-2009 at 08:14 PM. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. click site If it were a software related fault it would be consistent, not good at boot and broken later.
I googled it and is something about acpid, which I don't have installed and is also disabled in the BIOS. Christopher M. Does the local network need to be hacked first for IoT devices to be accesible?
C Libraries listed below, which are significantly older than the others above, albeit current for CentOS.glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.7 Sat 30 Oct 2010 11:34:39 AM PDTglibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.7 Sat 30 Oct 2010 11:34:39 AM PDTglibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 Sat Offline #20 2012-01-14 14:00:36 pedepy Member Registered: 2007-02-21 Posts: 198 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? I have a basic setup with no conf file at the moment so i cannot set the logmask but i am now recording the log file.Another quick question, should i manually Could boot a Live CD, mount partitions readonly and try to figure out from reading logs if something got installed, de-installed, updated, reconfigured, et cetera recently?
Thanks! –knorv Mar 31 '10 at 6:30 3 According to stackoverflow.com/a/2179464/1100614 , error is not the value of errno, but an architecture-specific error code for page faults. –Martin von Wittich The icon-theme.cache file in /usr/share/icons/gnome got corrupted in some way... Could it be a hardware problem? navigate to this website Just starting out and have a question?
unSpawn View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by unSpawn View Blog 01-13-2009, 05:55 PM #3 GaijinPunch Member Registered: Aug 2003 There's a tool that decodes it here. Send a Postcard! | Blog | PGP Key: F99FFE0FEAE999BD Offline #8 2012-01-05 09:46:44 DarkSniper Member Registered: 2011-04-05 Posts: 74 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Comment 5 Henrique Martins 2013-07-30 17:40:51 EDT Possible duplicate of bug 977995 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 977995 *** Note You need to log in
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. Any ideas whats going on?[24456909.686116] utserver: segfault at 30 ip b7e742dc sp b6c7af04 error 4 in libc-2.11.2.so[b7e00000+140000][24478132.073589] utserver: segfault at 240 ip b7db52dc sp b6bbbf04 error 4 in libc-2.11.2.so[b7d41000+140000]Thanks Share this same here64bit arch Offline #23 2012-01-17 17:11:36 jryan Member From: Philadelphia USA Registered: 2011-03-16 Posts: 29 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Sshd generates the exact same crash, though not all the times, i.e.
Got the same issue. Offline #2 2012-01-05 08:13:59 skunktrader Member From: Brisbane, Australia Registered: 2010-02-14 Posts: 1,322 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mcdonald 3 Software Developer Established Members 3 339 posts Posted January 3, 2011 · Report post ii libc-bin 2.11.2-6 Embedded The releases are built on Ubuntu, and those releases are unit, system, and stress tested.
Fionn (fbe) wrote on 2009-07-24: #13 I get the same error when I try to connect pidgin to the internal jabber server at work. But then Chromium worked.) I tried to downgrade Chromium to version 16.0.912.63, but it didn't help, still 'segmentation fault'.I also have Arch (64-bit) in Virtualbox, and I didn't update it yesterday. Here is what i tried: Thinking that libc-2.15.so might have gotten corrupt, I reinstalled the libc6 and libc-bin packages directly from the deb files, that didn't helpsuspecting a filesystem corruption, I It happened again.
Please follow these instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can be dealt with by the automatic retracer. Mine segfaulted for the first time this morning, though I've been living in Windows for the past few days, so I don't know when the issue came about. What the error means Here's the breakdown of the fields: address (after the at) - the location in memory the code is trying to access (it's likely that 10 and 11 Offline #19 2012-01-12 18:18:32 DarkSniper Member Registered: 2011-04-05 Posts: 74 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? @jwhendy: That error occurs because /usr/bin/chromium is just a wrapper script, the actual executable
Im thinking that the libc is incompatable. As hinted, I would start with memory.