The Rule of Thumb for Title Capitalization Before server side scripting how were HTML forms interpreted Small Diwali gifts, from an overseas visitor in India during the festive period? After todays upgrade to Chromium 16.0.912.75-1 (64-bit), I get segmentation fault. Sign Up All Content All Content This Topic This Forum Advanced Search Browse Forums Staff Online Users More Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started Search More Why are rainbows brighter through polarized glass? More about the author
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
Send a Postcard! | Blog | PGP Key: F99FFE0FEAE999BD Offline #4 2012-01-05 08:36:23 DarkSniper Member Registered: 2011-04-05 Posts: 74 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Pages: 1 2 Next #1 2012-01-05 06:55:48 DarkSniper Member Registered: 2011-04-05 Posts: 74 [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Talk to your hoster.
uTorrent randomly segfaults. Since it's so low here, presumably it's an offset being applied to a NUL pointer. –Charles Duffy Jul 28 '15 at 16:21 add a comment| up vote 13 down vote Error Offline #20 2012-01-14 14:00:36 pedepy Member Registered: 2007-02-21 Posts: 198 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications.
Also glibc 2.15-3.http://pastebin.com/a7gnC1eG(gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib/chromium/chromium [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [0115/032715:ERROR:logging_chrome.cc(325)] Unable to initialize logging to /usr/lib/chromium/chrome_debug.log: Permission denied [0115/032715:ERROR:logging_chrome.cc(325)] Unable to initialize logging to /usr/lib/chromium/chrome_debug.log: Permission denied [New It allowed me to type the username and password and after pressing enter it closed the window. strace for now: $ strace ntpstat execve("/usr/bin/ntpstat", ["ntpstat"], [/* 20 vars */]) = 0 brk(0) = 0xb9f06000 access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2549214/interpreting-segfault-messages Hot Network Questions Why is the bridge on smaller spacecraft at the front but not in bigger vessel?
Offline #5 2012-01-05 09:06:58 Allan is always right From: Brisbane, AU Registered: 2007-06-09 Posts: 10,452 Website Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Is there a way to dump them out?Most options are still default, except I use port 8888. I think gentoo forums) that id it and exited when there was an error. The segmentation was caused by overwriting a loaded shared object file.
I was thinking of replacing the HD and the RAM and reinstall debian and see if it will work flawlessly. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/segfault-error-697009/ From 213.157.xxx.xxx:35841 to 98.129.xxx.xxx:47712 ulen 75edit 2: after running tail on the logfile, it is still running (actively transferring files). Posts: 23,066 Blog Entries: 11 Rep: In that case it's a thermal fault of some sort; take it to the shop and have them check it. Running monit to monitor the service and restart it is definitely a temp fix but sometimes I have some pretty big torrents and @ 450MHz it takes awhile to check them
landysaccount View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by landysaccount 01-15-2009, 06:52 PM #13 GaijinPunch Member Registered: Aug 2003 Location: Tokyo, my review here Very annoying Offline #11 2012-01-06 10:36:45 samuvuo Member From: Finland Registered: 2011-02-20 Posts: 84 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? It works but then after a few hours it crashes with the following errors? Reinstalling chromium with pacman works as well. 64bit here as well.Is there any bugreport?
I was logged with putty and that connection didn't close. Browse other questions tagged c segmentation-fault libc or ask your own question. What else might be causing this problem? http://wx2me.com/segfault-error/segfault-error-4-in-libc-2-12-1-so.php Error message was: "org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply" : " "Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus)" " description: updated Lou (lou-dayspringpublisher) wrote on 2008-12-18: #2 I seem to have a related
dunno if it helps, but i've experienced the same crashes (or similar) using chrome, not chromium. [ 566.630889] chrome: segfault at b ip b346ff95 sp ae26b850 error 6 in libc-2.15.so[b3352000+19c000]seems to I changed the port back and have also tried the WebUI v0.380 WIP but its still occuring. The tests I'm running for every release are not encountering this problem, so I'd like to know under what conditions this problem occurs so I can reproduce it to fix it,
Would it be too much trouble to get you to run up a lenny VM and test?Thanks.** Edit **I've found that the segfault also occurs when there are no torrents running. Multiple counters in the same list Is the ritual of killing a animal as offering to maa KALI correct? Failure is not an option... Most definitely could be.
If either is yes, investigate there. subtle window manager | dotfiles Offline #25 2012-01-17 17:53:05 jryan Member From: Philadelphia USA Registered: 2011-03-16 Posts: 29 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Superman710e 0 Advanced Member Established Members 0 41 posts Posted January 4, 2011 · Report post Sorry to throw a http://wx2me.com/segfault-error/segfault-error-6-in-libc-2-11-3-so.php It comes bundled with Windows.
Or when I start my computer and I launch Chromium for the first time. It happened again. If you want to use Atomic, Plesk, or other things that replace core packages and do things their own way, then you may need to look elsewhere for support. It comes bundled with Windows.
Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Search this Thread 01-13-2009, 10:22 AM #1 landysaccount Member Registered: Sep 2008 Location: Dominican Republic Distribution: Debian Posts: 188 Rep: segfault Please try 2.15 or later. It booted again. To really test it, I would compile the kernel in an endless loop.
Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mcdonald 3 Software Developer Established Members 3 339 posts Posted January 5, 2011 · Report post Let me know if I use Fedora 11 ntp sources with *minimal* patching and certainly not in the area involved. Below was run as daemon only, no other switches.It ran for 22 minutes and 46 seconds before segfaulting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites yipikaye 0 Member Established Members 0 21 posts Posted January 5, 2011 · Report post Hi,reboot seems to fix it
asked 2 years ago viewed 1440 times active 2 years ago Linked 1 Where is my segmentation fault? Comment 4 udo 2009-06-16 11:42:33 EDT how can a patch that does only touch reflock nmea cause an issue in ntpstat that I start without arguments?