dmi.bios.version: 6.00 R1.11.2828.A1 dmi.board.name: D2828-A1 dmi.board.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS dmi.board.version: S26361-D2828-A1 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnFUJITSUSIEMENS//PhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr6.00R1.11.2828.A1:bd01/15/2009:svnFUJITSUSIEMENS:pnESPRIMOE7935:pvr:rvnFUJITSUSIEMENS:rnD2828-A1:rvrS26361-D2828-A1:cvnFUJITSUSIEMENS:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: ESPRIMO E7935 dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS Tags: apport-bug disk i386 kernel-uncat kj-triage maverick needs-upstream-testing Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in. Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. The time now is 08:21 AM. http://wx2me.com/sense-key/sense-key-medium-error-sense-code-0x73-0x03-macbook-pro.php
Note: This does not imply that the network operating system will work under all combinations of hardware and software. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. Word for a German "Ausflugscafé" - a cafe mainly catering to people taking a walk Is cardinality a well defined function? It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. go to this web-site
Thanks! Agreed, STP/SATA over SAS can cause a lot of problems, especially with the stupid drives/expanders with interposers on the controller or drive sled. Need to clarify this doubt doing some other combinations of experiment. apport-collect -p linux
I didn't find ATA path-through issue in 2.6.18-xen and 2.6.16-xen, but 2.6.29 and 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 have this issue. It looks to me as if these messages should simply not be > > treated as errors by the kernel -- smartctl explicitly asks for a response even > > if If too many of these happen at once, eventually disks start falling off RAIDs, and the entire machine goes down. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest.
Search this Thread 06-02-2010, 04:18 AM #1 jf.argentino Member Registered: Apr 2008 Location: Toulon (France) Distribution: FEDORA CORE Posts: 493 Rep: "[sdX] Sense Key : Recovered Error..." messages every Maybe it's something with the udev-system, where I only have to disable some automatisms to get a more reliable disk. Anyway, the bug report should be closed. Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
It's purely informational and doesn't > affect return processing of the command at all, so the kernel is > actually treating this as a successful completion not an error. It looks to me as if these messages should simply not be > treated as errors by the kernel -- smartctl explicitly asks for a response even > if the command I can shut the kernel up by making the recovered error processing clause look for 01/00/1D as well as REQ_QUIET, but it won't affect this problem. Scratch that; I could use smartctl all I wanted, but installing smartd promptly floored the entire card (and with it, the machine, since the RAID went away).
Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41612 Register If you are a new customer, register now for access to product evaluations and purchasing capabilities. If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag: 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'. SMART Attribute Thresholds Structure error: invalid SMART checksum. === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED ~$ cat /sys/block/sdm/device/ioerr_cnt 0x6 ~$ cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host4/device_delay 00 ~$
Why must we use bit shifting for Unity Layer masks? get redirected here This means the operation was successful, and the kernel knows it completed successfully, but the controller reports for informational purposes that it had to retry the operation or otherwise found something Log Out Select Your Language English español Deutsch italiano 한국어 français 日本語 português 中文 (中国) русский Customer Portal Products & Services Tools Security Community Infrastructure and Management Cloud Computing Storage JBoss Punching BagAutoModeratorBotBustsolidblubandman614Standalone SysAdminhighlord_foxBlinkenlights AdministratorVA_Network_NerdInfrastructure Architect & Cisco BigotLord_NShYHSystems Architectvitalyshpreperatabout moderation team »discussions in /r/sysadmin<>X· 2 comments Office 2013 can now block Macros92 points · 74 comments Dealing with screwups· 4 comments ScreenConnect - Cloud based or Self Hosted?449
Is that shitty and clunky combined? Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. Product Security Center Security Updates Security Advisories Red Hat CVE Database Security Labs Keep your systems secure with Red Hat's specialized responses for high-priority security vulnerabilities. http://wx2me.com/sense-key/sense-key-hardware-error-sense-code-0x09-0x02.php Current Customers and Partners Log in for full access Log In New to Red Hat?
Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log James --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c index f3c4089..a0235c9 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c @@ -774,7 +774,8 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes) * is what gets returned to the Gunderson 2010-05-12 17:42:13 UTC On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:20:14PM +0000, email@example.com wrote: > The originally reported problem has been fixed.
I found that the ST31500341AS has firmware issue: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1080005. Comment 1 Anonymous Emailer 2009-06-21 18:47:59 UTC Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 17:26 +0000, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13594 > > Summary: SMART responses for SATA disks on SAS get interpreted If that's > true, you'd likely only see the problem in a large disk setup ... however, for the LSI card, this bug will be in the SAT layer in the fusion firmware.
Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: **** List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices **** card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC663 Analog [ALC663 Analog] Subdevices: 0/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USER PID ACCESS We Acted. Here comes more data about my system: Linux borgcube 2.6.35-24-generic-pae #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 2 03:21:31 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic-pae 188.8.131.52 Description: Ubuntu 10.10 Release: 10.10 Extra informations come my review here LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware "[sdX] Sense Key : Recovered Error..." messages every 30mn User Name Remember Me?
Sense: Logical unit failed self-configuration [588675.152747] sd 0:0:4:0: [sde] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 2b 6a 42 70 00 00 18 00 [588675.152751] end_request: I/O error, dev sde, sector 728384112 [588675.152755] sd Sense: ATA pass through information available smartctl outputs look OK, I'm doing a "e2fsck -c -c -f -k -y" on every hd right now, i'm waiting the result in something like end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 3903551 md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0 RAID1 conf printout: --- wd:1 rd:2 disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda1 disk 1, wo:1, o:0, dev:sdb1 RAID1 conf printout: I can shut the kernel up by > making the recovered error processing clause look for 01/00/1D as well > as REQ_QUIET, but it won't affect this problem.
Product Security Center Security Updates Security Advisories Red Hat CVE Database Security Labs Keep your systems secure with Red Hat's specialized responses for high-priority security vulnerabilities. Code blocks~~~ Code surrounded in tildes is easier to read ~~~ Links/URLs[Red Hat Customer Portal](https://access.redhat.com) Learn more Close Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki. I can shut the kernel up by >>> making the recovered error processing clause look for 01/00/1D as well >>> as REQ_QUIET, but it won't affect this problem. >> I tried Explore Labs Configuration Deployment Troubleshooting Security Additional Tools Red Hat Access plug-ins Red Hat Satellite Certificate Tool Red Hat Insights Increase visibility into IT operations to detect and resolve technical issues
Best regards Cláudio Comment 10 kashyap 2010-04-05 07:49:42 UTC Claudio, I tried doing similar stuffs at my setup and I was not able to see similar issue as reported by you. Code: Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 1105 - # 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 0 - smartctl outputs on others Legal Notices Red Hat Customer Portal Skip to main content Main Navigation Products & Services Back View All Products Infrastructure and Management Back Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red James Comment 2 Anonymous Emailer 2009-06-21 18:55:06 UTC Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:47 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > [ 811.091916] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Sense Key : Recovered Error
At reboot, I kept seeing the “IOC is in FAULT state” until I got logged in and killed smartd again. /* Steinar */ [588630.695020] mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort! (sc=ffff880182bab200) [588630.702007] But: when I remove all filesystems and partitions the disk itself seems to "hop on hop off": Jan 18 11:53:03 borgcube kernel: [4146611.121046] usb 1-3: new high speed USB de vice When I was fast enough to bring a FS onto the disk and to bring it up I could use the disk but I also had one time data-loss. Finally I test 2.6.36, ATA issue seems solved.
That ASC/ASCQ pair basically means "you asked for them and here they are". [reference: sat2r07b.pdf section 12.2.5 table 107 when CK_COND is 1] As for the hiccup, I have noticed that sdk: Current: sense key: Recovered Error Oct 13 14:36:50 server kernel: <
BTW, smartctl cannot find the disk: /dev/sdb: Unknown USB bridge [0x04e8:0x60a6 (0x100)] It might be that the disk simply is a bit new but hey, it's just a disk... Any help with this is appreciated, since the fact that drives are being kicked from MD arrays, makes Smartmontools use quite difficult. The disk? /* Steinar */ Comment 7 Matthew Wilcox 2009-06-22 12:04:31 UTC On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:53:29PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > As for the hiccup, I have noticed We Acted.